DO NOT READ THIS IF YOU HAVEN'T SEEN THE ORIGINAL KICK-ASS
"Robin wishes he was me." - Hit Girl.
"Kick Ass 2. Does it 'Kick Ass' or is it a kick up the ass for the producers?" - Sean Cassidy.
Similarly to my Twilight review, I'm not sure where to start with this one, but, I'm happy to say, for the exact opposite reason! This film is a vast improvement on Kick Ass. The character development is a lot better than the first film- the superheroes develop actual personalities and lives, which makes them more relatable and better characters.
Hit Girl, A.K.A Mindy Macready, is trying to cope with the loss of her father by training to be a better superhero than she ever was, in order to defend the city. Kick-Ass, or Dave Lizewski, gets bored of retirement and joins her to form a team, however after being caught out by new guardian Marcus Williams, Hit Girl retires in order to try and become a normal teenager.
The story of Mindy Macready the normal teenager is funny and heart-breaking at the same time. She is taken in by a clique of popular girls and seems to be settling in alright, until they reach a hitch in the road and they embarrass her, leaving her angry, humiliated and wanting revenge. She does this in a disgusting but hilarious way, which leaves the audience crying with laughter and feeling a little bit ill. She's her own woman in this film, we watch her mature and make her own choices and get even more bad-ass and its amazing!
Whilst Hit Girl is trying to fit in and be normal, Kick-Ass joins a group of caped crusaders (inspired by him) trying to protect the city. Justice Forever is led by a bad ass Jim Carrey, playing Colonel Stars and Stripes. The group is made up of misfits wanting to protect others- Insect Man, Night Bitch, Doctor Gravity, Battle-Guy (who's true identity is a lot closer to home than anyone saw coming!) and Remembering Tommy. With the training from Hit Girl, and Justice Forever doing so well at reducing crime in the state, Dave develops a new found strength (in more than one way!), which will eventually lead to his downfall at the hands of something a lot worse than drug dealers and street robbers...
With his father killed by Kick-Ass in the previous film, Red Mist, A.K.A Chris D'Amico wants revenge, but is feeling stifled by his mother. In a twisted series of events, he comes back as The Motherfucker, a super rich super-villain, out for revenge on Kick-Ass. He hires a crack team of hit men, and declares war on Kick-Ass by intimidation, going for the ones he loves. These attacks are brutally violent and very clearly lifted from comics, in the moves shown and the humour used.
The climax scene is a massive fight between the good and the evil, with surprises on both sides. It depicts revenge, and love, and friendship, and (obviously) the battle between good and evil! These are the morals underlying the whole film, and it addresses them all fantastically, while managing to be hilarious at the same time! You should all, definitely, go and see it.
Cath on a hot tin roof
Popular Posts
-
So I was looking at the Bafta Nominations, deciding which films I had to see and which could be avoided. I'm going to see Les Miserables...
-
So I've been meaning to write this one for a while. I'm not entirely sure on where to start... I think it might be the fact that Bel...
-
So I've spoke before on my dislike for Keira Knightley, and her general one-dimensional acting qualities. But in the last two films I...
Tuesday 20 August 2013
Sunday 4 August 2013
The Twilight Saga: One girls struggle about the choice between bestiality and necrophilia
So I've been meaning to write this one for a while. I'm not entirely sure on where to start... I think it might be the fact that Bella, the leading female character, a) displays absolutely no emotion apart from to curl up into a foetal position for months on end (grow a pair, girl, we all have break ups.); b) has a life that revolves solely around a boy who shows about as much emotion as her, barely talks and won't touch her (how in gods name was that ever going to work?!) and c) reinforces a stereotype that should be with Fiona Bruce on Antiques Roadshow, that women need a man to survive (what ever happened to feminism?). So while the audience is struggling to watch all that with the main character alone, there are other flaws as well.
The problem I have with the Cullen family, is that none of them seem to have any depth or charisma. Like I said, Edward barely talks, he just sits there looking all broody and mysterious- which is a good look for Robert Pattinson, however it does not make for a good character. Alice would probably be interesting if she had more screen time, she's fun and entertaining and can see the future, so that's the basis of a good character, however the films do not go into enough detail with her. Rosalie just seems to be bitter about being a vampire, and hates Bella for some reason, which isn't explained either. Parents Carlisle and Esme, and Jasper and Emmett are barely touched upon, so I can't really say much about them. And underlying all of this is the fact that traditionally, vampires are human hunting bad asses that burn in the sun- not a group of teenagers that keep repeating high school (who does that?), and sparkle in the sun!
So in this everlasting struggle that Bella goes through, there's the werewolf as well, Jacob. To give credit to Taylor Lautner, he does well with what he has... which is basically to take his top off every 5 minutes (not that I'm saying that's a bad thing, but again, doesn't make for the best character). He loves Bella throughout all the films, till he realises he's imprinted (basically love at first sight, even if one of the people is a baby.) on her daughter! So that's not a messed up situation at all. Jacob's got more about him than the Cullen family, but he's a bit of a pathetic character, doting on Bella all the time.
I don't hate everything about these films though... the soundtracks are pretty good! This would normally change my opinion on a film, for instance The Perks of Being a Wallflower doesn't have the best story in the world, but it's alright and the soundtrack's really good so that changed my mind... however Twilight doesn't even have an alright plot, so I still don't like it, sorry to the respective directors and Stephanie Meyer, but it wasn't my cup of tea.
The problem I have with the Cullen family, is that none of them seem to have any depth or charisma. Like I said, Edward barely talks, he just sits there looking all broody and mysterious- which is a good look for Robert Pattinson, however it does not make for a good character. Alice would probably be interesting if she had more screen time, she's fun and entertaining and can see the future, so that's the basis of a good character, however the films do not go into enough detail with her. Rosalie just seems to be bitter about being a vampire, and hates Bella for some reason, which isn't explained either. Parents Carlisle and Esme, and Jasper and Emmett are barely touched upon, so I can't really say much about them. And underlying all of this is the fact that traditionally, vampires are human hunting bad asses that burn in the sun- not a group of teenagers that keep repeating high school (who does that?), and sparkle in the sun!
So in this everlasting struggle that Bella goes through, there's the werewolf as well, Jacob. To give credit to Taylor Lautner, he does well with what he has... which is basically to take his top off every 5 minutes (not that I'm saying that's a bad thing, but again, doesn't make for the best character). He loves Bella throughout all the films, till he realises he's imprinted (basically love at first sight, even if one of the people is a baby.) on her daughter! So that's not a messed up situation at all. Jacob's got more about him than the Cullen family, but he's a bit of a pathetic character, doting on Bella all the time.
I don't hate everything about these films though... the soundtracks are pretty good! This would normally change my opinion on a film, for instance The Perks of Being a Wallflower doesn't have the best story in the world, but it's alright and the soundtrack's really good so that changed my mind... however Twilight doesn't even have an alright plot, so I still don't like it, sorry to the respective directors and Stephanie Meyer, but it wasn't my cup of tea.
Monday 13 May 2013
Moulin Rouge
Who knows why it's taken me this long to blog about moulin rouge, considering it's one of my favourite films ever and might be my favourite musical (I'm constantly torn between this, grease and les mis!)
I don't think I can find a fault with Moulin Rouge, I honestly don't. Baz Lurhman built the musical around already fantastic love songs- One Day I'll Fly Away is, to this day, my favourite song from a musical and I have a quote from it tattooed on my back. The merging of many great love songs into the Elephant Love Medley is both well executed by the actors, and beautifully blended.
Speaking of the actors (I'll come back to the music), Nicole Kidman plays her role very well, at the beginning seeming aloof and unavailable, then portraying a young girl in love, she was, in the first instance, attractive and believable, and when in love, completely endearing and adorable!
Ewan McGregor also played the role of a naive young boy dazzled by Satine's beauty and aloofness very well, at the beginning I believed him to be a pathetic, doe eyed little boy that focused on someone out of his reach a little bit too much... but then he started fighting (and singing) for what he cared about and he finally became a man!
Back on to the music. I don't think the fact that the songs aren't original depletes the quality of the film, I think it makes it a unique musical that fits a beautifully scripted and well acted story.
So basically, this is a just about perfect musical and you should all definitely watch it!
I don't think I can find a fault with Moulin Rouge, I honestly don't. Baz Lurhman built the musical around already fantastic love songs- One Day I'll Fly Away is, to this day, my favourite song from a musical and I have a quote from it tattooed on my back. The merging of many great love songs into the Elephant Love Medley is both well executed by the actors, and beautifully blended.
Speaking of the actors (I'll come back to the music), Nicole Kidman plays her role very well, at the beginning seeming aloof and unavailable, then portraying a young girl in love, she was, in the first instance, attractive and believable, and when in love, completely endearing and adorable!
Ewan McGregor also played the role of a naive young boy dazzled by Satine's beauty and aloofness very well, at the beginning I believed him to be a pathetic, doe eyed little boy that focused on someone out of his reach a little bit too much... but then he started fighting (and singing) for what he cared about and he finally became a man!
Back on to the music. I don't think the fact that the songs aren't original depletes the quality of the film, I think it makes it a unique musical that fits a beautifully scripted and well acted story.
So basically, this is a just about perfect musical and you should all definitely watch it!
Sunday 24 March 2013
Les Miserables
SPOILER ALERT
I've seen this film twice now, and on coming out of both of them I have thought 'I can't blog about this, I was too emotional.' But I've thought more about the film and decided I can! So here goes..
First of all, the actors. Hugh Jackman, Anne Hathaway, Amanda Seyfried, Eddie Redmayne and the less well known Samantha Barks, were all amazing!
Hugh Jackman was so captivating, I had a serious mental debate about whether he was good or evil- I was also surprised by his singing voice, although people tell me he's been in quite a lot. When he came out of the sewer, half of me was amazed and half of me wanted to throw up. I thought the way he turned his life around was really inspirational, and although parts of the story were a little exaggerated (which isn't a criticism, but they are a bit) I think a lot of people with bad pasts will relate to this and be inspired by it.
I was surprised by Anne Hathaway in this if I'm honest! I don't normally like her, she seems like a bit of a barbie doll for Hollywood... One Day, Love and other drugs, Alice in Wonderland, Bride Wars, Rachel Getting Married, The Devil Wears Prada... I could go on! Her part in every single one of this films has been, in my opinion, completely shallow and exactly the same character. Her performance of 'I Dreamed A Dream', however, was so filled with emotion and genuineness that it brought me (and not only me I'm sure) to tears. Her death was also beautiful- as much as a death can be really- and as a mother myself, the words she was singing to her daughter Cosette really got to me.
I honestly wish I could say that Amanda Seyfried also surprised me, but she didn't. I'm not saying that she's a bad actress, or what she does isn't enjoyable to watch or without its merit- but it's not exactly going to change the face of movies forever is it? She was hilarious in Mean Girls, and endearing in Dear John, Letters to Juliet and Mamma Mia. She was sweet and endearing in this, but she didn't blow me away. This is partly due to the character, in my opinion, who was not written with the greatest depth of all the female characters in the film.
I had similar feelings towards Marius that I did towards Cosette really- he was a good character in himself, and Eddie Redmayne is a good actor himself- but he isn't the most interesting character in the film, and I worry that Redmayne is just going to get type cast into the same sort of roles in every film- one with little depth that falls in love early and fawns over the girl for the rest of the film- hence this, My Week With Marilyn, Tess of the D'urbevilles. I do think Redmayne has the potential to do more than this, but I'd like to see it happen.
My favourite female lead in this was definitely Eponine. I felt sorry for her, having con artists and pick pockets for parents, but the way she fought through it and was a cool revolutionary woman was admirable- plus her death was beautiful, it was nice to see a strong independent woman dying for love, as opposed to weak soppy girls letting men die all over the place for them! Samantha Barks isn't an actress I knew very well, but she broke my heart with her performance of 'On My Own' and with her death. Victor Hugo deserves a medal for the way he wrote that character.
With Russell Crowe, I felt like they just picked him in order to get big names in if I'm honest. His singing voice wasn't great, but he did portray the character well- I was really scared for Valjean (Jackman) and Cosette! But no, I think there are better people that could have played the role, but nice effort Crowe!
The subsidiary actors also definitely deserve a mention here, Sacha Baron Cohen and Helena Bonham Carter were hilarious as the Thenardier's, Master of the House was the catchiest song of the film, and they just generally lightened the mood! The lead revolutionary, Enjolras, was an inspirational character and a charismatic actor- I've never seen Aaron Tveit in any of his other work, but I'd like to after this performance! I was sad when he died, but it was a heroes death and a necessary one! Gavroche, a young revolutionary, was a lovely character! He made me laugh, and made me root for the revolutionaries. (as if I wouldn't have anyway though.) Nothing made me cry more than his death!
I can't review Les Mis, without talking about the music. Not only did the actors deliver the songs with heart and passion and love, but they were so well written! The tunes were rousing, and conveyed the different characters amazingly, and the lyrics were beautiful, sad, funny, everything.
So basically, to conclude, this film is amazing, beautiful and heartbreaking, and absolutely everyone should see it. Please follow and tweet @HotTinRoofCat
I've seen this film twice now, and on coming out of both of them I have thought 'I can't blog about this, I was too emotional.' But I've thought more about the film and decided I can! So here goes..
First of all, the actors. Hugh Jackman, Anne Hathaway, Amanda Seyfried, Eddie Redmayne and the less well known Samantha Barks, were all amazing!
Hugh Jackman was so captivating, I had a serious mental debate about whether he was good or evil- I was also surprised by his singing voice, although people tell me he's been in quite a lot. When he came out of the sewer, half of me was amazed and half of me wanted to throw up. I thought the way he turned his life around was really inspirational, and although parts of the story were a little exaggerated (which isn't a criticism, but they are a bit) I think a lot of people with bad pasts will relate to this and be inspired by it.
I was surprised by Anne Hathaway in this if I'm honest! I don't normally like her, she seems like a bit of a barbie doll for Hollywood... One Day, Love and other drugs, Alice in Wonderland, Bride Wars, Rachel Getting Married, The Devil Wears Prada... I could go on! Her part in every single one of this films has been, in my opinion, completely shallow and exactly the same character. Her performance of 'I Dreamed A Dream', however, was so filled with emotion and genuineness that it brought me (and not only me I'm sure) to tears. Her death was also beautiful- as much as a death can be really- and as a mother myself, the words she was singing to her daughter Cosette really got to me.
I honestly wish I could say that Amanda Seyfried also surprised me, but she didn't. I'm not saying that she's a bad actress, or what she does isn't enjoyable to watch or without its merit- but it's not exactly going to change the face of movies forever is it? She was hilarious in Mean Girls, and endearing in Dear John, Letters to Juliet and Mamma Mia. She was sweet and endearing in this, but she didn't blow me away. This is partly due to the character, in my opinion, who was not written with the greatest depth of all the female characters in the film.
I had similar feelings towards Marius that I did towards Cosette really- he was a good character in himself, and Eddie Redmayne is a good actor himself- but he isn't the most interesting character in the film, and I worry that Redmayne is just going to get type cast into the same sort of roles in every film- one with little depth that falls in love early and fawns over the girl for the rest of the film- hence this, My Week With Marilyn, Tess of the D'urbevilles. I do think Redmayne has the potential to do more than this, but I'd like to see it happen.
My favourite female lead in this was definitely Eponine. I felt sorry for her, having con artists and pick pockets for parents, but the way she fought through it and was a cool revolutionary woman was admirable- plus her death was beautiful, it was nice to see a strong independent woman dying for love, as opposed to weak soppy girls letting men die all over the place for them! Samantha Barks isn't an actress I knew very well, but she broke my heart with her performance of 'On My Own' and with her death. Victor Hugo deserves a medal for the way he wrote that character.
With Russell Crowe, I felt like they just picked him in order to get big names in if I'm honest. His singing voice wasn't great, but he did portray the character well- I was really scared for Valjean (Jackman) and Cosette! But no, I think there are better people that could have played the role, but nice effort Crowe!
The subsidiary actors also definitely deserve a mention here, Sacha Baron Cohen and Helena Bonham Carter were hilarious as the Thenardier's, Master of the House was the catchiest song of the film, and they just generally lightened the mood! The lead revolutionary, Enjolras, was an inspirational character and a charismatic actor- I've never seen Aaron Tveit in any of his other work, but I'd like to after this performance! I was sad when he died, but it was a heroes death and a necessary one! Gavroche, a young revolutionary, was a lovely character! He made me laugh, and made me root for the revolutionaries. (as if I wouldn't have anyway though.) Nothing made me cry more than his death!
I can't review Les Mis, without talking about the music. Not only did the actors deliver the songs with heart and passion and love, but they were so well written! The tunes were rousing, and conveyed the different characters amazingly, and the lyrics were beautiful, sad, funny, everything.
So basically, to conclude, this film is amazing, beautiful and heartbreaking, and absolutely everyone should see it. Please follow and tweet @HotTinRoofCat
Thursday 10 January 2013
AVENGERS ASSEMBLE
So I was looking at the Bafta Nominations, deciding which films I had to see and which could be avoided. I'm going to see Les Miserables and Life of Pi next week, I've seen Anna Karenina, Skyfall and The Best Exotic Marigold Hotel (although fuck knows why that's nominated.), and I can't really be arsed with Argo! So that mini debate in my head brought me to the conclusion, watch Avengers.
I've got to tell you, I don't regret the decision AT ALL. I normally make fairly good notes on a film, quite professional, talking about technical things that impress me- but this is just constantly like: Iron Man? Boss. Thor? WOW. Captain America? Souuund. Which basically sums up my feelings for the film- I was just constantly like "OH MY GOD THAT'S AMAZING"
But no, ranting over, it is an excellent film. The writing is phenomenal and hilarious, the actors deliver it well, as well as making the audience engage with them. The shots are also really well done, showing the outline of the city, and the prominence of Stark Towers (where necessary), and promoting the high standard of work that the special effects team have put in, particularly when the aliens start invading and the sky gets ripped apart, that was boss.
The writing though, that was really well done, some of the banter had between the Avengers and Loki, as well as between the Avengers themselves, was absolutely hilarious...
Other lines impress me as well, the banter that Tony Stark (Iron Man- Robert Downey Junior) and Pepper Potts have is hilarious and engaging- Stark has annoyed me with his ego in the past but I think it was done with the right measure in this film- partly because it gets played off the ego's of all the other Avengers! Particularly Thor... a superhero that can smash just about anything to smithereens with his hammer... which I accept sounds either like an innuendo or a bit shit... but trust me it is not. I mean look at him! (Despite the fact that he is wearing his "mothers drapes") He seems a bit disdainful of the other Avengers, but that makes him a funny character and it makes the film better, with the relationships between the characters- "You people are so petty...and tiny."
If I'm honest, The Hulk, or Bruce Banner (Mark Ruffalo), wasn't my favourite Avenger, but that wasn't to say he wasn't a good character! I didn't find myself caring about him as much as I did towards Black Widow, or Natasha Romanoff (Scarlett Johansson). I think this is because I personally didn't have much in common with his human self, and I didn't think he was THAT good a superhero- just a big ball of muscle without much personality, I prefer them with personality! That isn't to say he wasn't a necessary character in the film, and I didn't particularly dislike him, I just wasn't really bothered by him.
I mentioned Black Widow there, I absolutely adore her. She's a kick-ass, strong, beautiful woman. Not that being beautiful is necessary to make her a good character, or actress, but it does make her a bit more impressive when it comes to the action scenes. The film properly opened with one of hers for instance, and it's kind of enlightening to see a woman in a difficult situation that doesn't need saving by a man!
The last Avenger, Captain America, or Steve Rogers, was a pretty good character, he made me laugh with his interaction with Stark, and I wouldn't want to take him on in a fight! I did like him, he was a good superhero and a funny character, but I don't know, I don't think he argued back enough for me. Stark is very clear that he likes doing his own thing, and at the start he was quite clear that he didn't want to be a part of this 'team', so that's why I like him. That's not to say Capt. America isn't a good character, he's just a bit too nice for me!
It took me a while to believe the evilness of the villain, Loki (Tom Hiddleston) but when I did, I really did. He seemed so genuinely evil... the way he got into Romanoff's head and scared her was phenomenal, I thought she was made of steel. He was also really cunning, the way he tricked Thor into the cage. Similarly to my taste in heroes, in villains I like some personality, more than just muscle and "LETS TAKE OVER THE WORLD!"- I liked the scene in Stark's flat, when they were arguing... he had personality there, he was teasing Stark, it was good.
An Avengers Assemble review would not be complete without a mention to the creator of S.H.I.E.L.D (or the Avengers, which I think is a better name), Nick Fury. Samuel L Jackson outdoes himself every time I see him. I've got no idea why Loki was so brazen facing him, he's so commanding! and enigmatic, and just generally fucking terrifying!
So my conclusion to this film is, well done Whedon. Absolutely fantastic film, I couldn't keep away from it, and I just kept going wow! that's amazing! Can't think of a better comic book movie of these days, but I haven't seen The Dark Knight Rises yet!
I've got to tell you, I don't regret the decision AT ALL. I normally make fairly good notes on a film, quite professional, talking about technical things that impress me- but this is just constantly like: Iron Man? Boss. Thor? WOW. Captain America? Souuund. Which basically sums up my feelings for the film- I was just constantly like "OH MY GOD THAT'S AMAZING"
But no, ranting over, it is an excellent film. The writing is phenomenal and hilarious, the actors deliver it well, as well as making the audience engage with them. The shots are also really well done, showing the outline of the city, and the prominence of Stark Towers (where necessary), and promoting the high standard of work that the special effects team have put in, particularly when the aliens start invading and the sky gets ripped apart, that was boss.
The writing though, that was really well done, some of the banter had between the Avengers and Loki, as well as between the Avengers themselves, was absolutely hilarious...
Other lines impress me as well, the banter that Tony Stark (Iron Man- Robert Downey Junior) and Pepper Potts have is hilarious and engaging- Stark has annoyed me with his ego in the past but I think it was done with the right measure in this film- partly because it gets played off the ego's of all the other Avengers! Particularly Thor... a superhero that can smash just about anything to smithereens with his hammer... which I accept sounds either like an innuendo or a bit shit... but trust me it is not. I mean look at him! (Despite the fact that he is wearing his "mothers drapes") He seems a bit disdainful of the other Avengers, but that makes him a funny character and it makes the film better, with the relationships between the characters- "You people are so petty...and tiny."
If I'm honest, The Hulk, or Bruce Banner (Mark Ruffalo), wasn't my favourite Avenger, but that wasn't to say he wasn't a good character! I didn't find myself caring about him as much as I did towards Black Widow, or Natasha Romanoff (Scarlett Johansson). I think this is because I personally didn't have much in common with his human self, and I didn't think he was THAT good a superhero- just a big ball of muscle without much personality, I prefer them with personality! That isn't to say he wasn't a necessary character in the film, and I didn't particularly dislike him, I just wasn't really bothered by him.
I mentioned Black Widow there, I absolutely adore her. She's a kick-ass, strong, beautiful woman. Not that being beautiful is necessary to make her a good character, or actress, but it does make her a bit more impressive when it comes to the action scenes. The film properly opened with one of hers for instance, and it's kind of enlightening to see a woman in a difficult situation that doesn't need saving by a man!
The last Avenger, Captain America, or Steve Rogers, was a pretty good character, he made me laugh with his interaction with Stark, and I wouldn't want to take him on in a fight! I did like him, he was a good superhero and a funny character, but I don't know, I don't think he argued back enough for me. Stark is very clear that he likes doing his own thing, and at the start he was quite clear that he didn't want to be a part of this 'team', so that's why I like him. That's not to say Capt. America isn't a good character, he's just a bit too nice for me!
It took me a while to believe the evilness of the villain, Loki (Tom Hiddleston) but when I did, I really did. He seemed so genuinely evil... the way he got into Romanoff's head and scared her was phenomenal, I thought she was made of steel. He was also really cunning, the way he tricked Thor into the cage. Similarly to my taste in heroes, in villains I like some personality, more than just muscle and "LETS TAKE OVER THE WORLD!"- I liked the scene in Stark's flat, when they were arguing... he had personality there, he was teasing Stark, it was good.
An Avengers Assemble review would not be complete without a mention to the creator of S.H.I.E.L.D (or the Avengers, which I think is a better name), Nick Fury. Samuel L Jackson outdoes himself every time I see him. I've got no idea why Loki was so brazen facing him, he's so commanding! and enigmatic, and just generally fucking terrifying!
So my conclusion to this film is, well done Whedon. Absolutely fantastic film, I couldn't keep away from it, and I just kept going wow! that's amazing! Can't think of a better comic book movie of these days, but I haven't seen The Dark Knight Rises yet!
Wednesday 9 January 2013
The Iron Lady
I was kind of apprehensive towards this film if I'm honest, simply because of the subject. I'm an incredibly active Labour supporter, and was brought up just generally not liking Margaret Thatcher. Therefore, watching a film about her was never going to be my cup of tea. If I'm honest, I walked away from the film feeling a bit confused. I didn't like her, obviously because I don't agree with anything she did, but I also kind of felt sorry for her- it isn't really about her time in power, more about her dementia and her husbands death, and to be fair to the producers it does make the audience feel sympathy.
I wasn't really sure if Meryl Streep deserved awards for this, but when I thought about it she must have done, because I don't think Ms Thatcher would be an easy person to relate to therefore give a realistic performance of.. but that is completely personal opinion. I wouldn't find Maggie easy to relate to because I have completely different political views from her. Even though I wasn't born when she was in power, I have heard that there was a certain coldness about her, which I can definitely believe- however I don't think Streep conveyed this effectively... largely because I'm fairly certain she's a nice person!
The other actors in the film do give a credible performance, particularly Jim Broadbent, but I felt towards him the same as I did towards Thatcher herself. I didn't want to like him, I didn't want to feel sorry for either of them, but I did. However, I think that it is the sign of either very good acting, or the characters have been written to ignore the parts of them that I don't like... in which case I missed it. I don't think the characters have been written like this though, because they were still very clearly tories, and I still felt sorry for them, therefore, well done Streep and Broadbent!
If I'm honest, I felt a bit weird after watching The Iron Lady. I think it's because I was expecting to be furiously angry at Thatcher, but I actually felt kind of sorry for her. That, in itself, pissed me off though, because I don't want to feel sorry for her, I can't stand the woman! I do think the actors gave a good performance though, I don't think people like that would be easy to portray in a positive light.
The other actors in the film do give a credible performance, particularly Jim Broadbent, but I felt towards him the same as I did towards Thatcher herself. I didn't want to like him, I didn't want to feel sorry for either of them, but I did. However, I think that it is the sign of either very good acting, or the characters have been written to ignore the parts of them that I don't like... in which case I missed it. I don't think the characters have been written like this though, because they were still very clearly tories, and I still felt sorry for them, therefore, well done Streep and Broadbent!
If I'm honest, I felt a bit weird after watching The Iron Lady. I think it's because I was expecting to be furiously angry at Thatcher, but I actually felt kind of sorry for her. That, in itself, pissed me off though, because I don't want to feel sorry for her, I can't stand the woman! I do think the actors gave a good performance though, I don't think people like that would be easy to portray in a positive light.
Friday 21 December 2012
A dangerous method
So I've spoke before on my dislike for Keira Knightley, and her general one-dimensional acting qualities. But in the last two films I've seen her in- 'Anna Karenina' and this, she has actually been a really interesting and compelling character.
I dont think her character, Sabina, was an easy one to play, considering the sensitive nature of her illness and the effect it is having on her adult life. At the start of the film, she was sufficiently insane, but grew out of that well and into a likable but still visibly unstable female lead. Maybe Knightley just suits foreign parts? Either way I liked her in this and as the tortured lover Anna.
I found the relationship between Jung and Freud interesting to watch, and well played by both Michael Fassbender and Viggo Mortensen. They seemed to have the appropriate professional relationship at the start of the film and grew into suitable competitiors, both displaying the characters they had been assigned- particularly in Mortensens case with Sigmund Freud. As with the case of Sabina, I think that Freud would be a very hard character to play, given his views on the human psyche and his addiction to cocaine- although the film does not touch upon this aspect of the man I believe it would change the character on a whole.
Fassbender gives an interesting performance of Jung, showing the professionalism within his character but at the same time the flaw, in falling for the patient. I've only ever seen this actor in 'Shame', where he plays a much different character, but I think it shows that he is a versatile actor and a bloody high quality one at that.
I'm struggling to find the words to describe this film if I'm honest, mainly because I think it was so character based that they are the only things I can comment on- all in all I thought it was a good watch with an interesting story, but I'm not going to put it up there in a 'Must Buy DVD' (post to come). It might be worth sticking on Lovefilm, but not worth paying more than £10 on.
I dont think her character, Sabina, was an easy one to play, considering the sensitive nature of her illness and the effect it is having on her adult life. At the start of the film, she was sufficiently insane, but grew out of that well and into a likable but still visibly unstable female lead. Maybe Knightley just suits foreign parts? Either way I liked her in this and as the tortured lover Anna.
I found the relationship between Jung and Freud interesting to watch, and well played by both Michael Fassbender and Viggo Mortensen. They seemed to have the appropriate professional relationship at the start of the film and grew into suitable competitiors, both displaying the characters they had been assigned- particularly in Mortensens case with Sigmund Freud. As with the case of Sabina, I think that Freud would be a very hard character to play, given his views on the human psyche and his addiction to cocaine- although the film does not touch upon this aspect of the man I believe it would change the character on a whole.
Fassbender gives an interesting performance of Jung, showing the professionalism within his character but at the same time the flaw, in falling for the patient. I've only ever seen this actor in 'Shame', where he plays a much different character, but I think it shows that he is a versatile actor and a bloody high quality one at that.
I'm struggling to find the words to describe this film if I'm honest, mainly because I think it was so character based that they are the only things I can comment on- all in all I thought it was a good watch with an interesting story, but I'm not going to put it up there in a 'Must Buy DVD' (post to come). It might be worth sticking on Lovefilm, but not worth paying more than £10 on.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)